So my semester here in Toulouse is winding down and I fly
back to the United States tomorrow. My exams are done, my volunteer job is
over, my goodbyes have been said and the suitcases are packed. Tomorrow I fly
from Toulouse to Madrid, and then to Boston. It would be tedious for me to
write out (and have you read) all my thoughts on being abroad, and I’m sure
I’ll get the chance to talk to you about it in person in the near future. The
bottom line is I’m glad I did it and I learned a lot – about myself, about
France, about the French, and about the United States. I could go on and on
about all the cultural similarities and differences.
La place du Capitole in Toulouse |
I wanted to share some thoughts about something I learned in
my class at Sciences-Po, Socio-histoire
des idées politiques (Social history of political ideas). This isn’t really
linked to being abroad, but it’s interesting nonetheless. We studied the three
main types of political thought in the 19th and 20th
century in France – traditionalism, liberalism, and socialism. In the day, the
traditionalists (politically conservative) were losing power and influence
because they were unable to appeal to the voting masses. Their ideas weren't
keeping up with the modernization of the political theories, and their
political attitudes did not mesh with the revolutionary, rights of man attitude
of the modern political field. The French republicans (politically liberal) appealed
to the voting masses with their calls for human rights, universal suffrage, and
the like. The traditionalists fell by the wayside, and as time went on, more
people gained the right and ability to vote, and those people tended to vote
for the more liberal French republicans. Interestingly, this is exactly what
you see now with the current American GOP: they aren't keeping up with the modernity
of society and the progressiveness of the electorate, so they are losing
influence and elections. As the electorate becomes bigger and more diverse, the
Republicans (American) are struggling to maintain power, just like the 19th
century French traditionalists. This is true political science – no matter
where you look in history, you can see this repetition. It’s fascinating.
The Garonne River |
Back to the subject of being abroad. Like I said earlier, I
learned a lot about the United States from studying in France. I’ll explain
some of my core takeaways from that learning experience. When we think of the
faults of America – racism, gender inequality, homophobia – we sometimes think
that they are the faults of only
America. But being abroad has showed me that these ugly practices can be found
in every country, and oftentimes in larger doses. Americans think of Europe as
the liberal citadel of the world because you can smoke pot in Amsterdam and
Spanish women regularly sunbathe topless on public beaches. It is true that you
can find more progressive attitudes among Europeans in some areas, but that
doesn’t mean progressivity is more prolific in Europe than in America. For
example, only nine European countries recognize same-sex marriage (while twelve
U.S. states do), and ten European countries constitutionally define marriage as
only between one man and one woman. Women gained the right to vote in the U.S.
in 1920 – female suffrage did not come to fruition in the Netherlands until
1922, in Spain until 1931, in France until 1945, in Italy until 1946, in
Belgium until 1948, and in Switzerland until, shockingly, 1971. The French
Parliament is made up of 19 percent women, to the U.S. Congress’s 18.3 percent.
In the U.S. Congress, 96 of the 538 members (17.84 percent) are racial
minorities; in the EU Parliament, 15 of the 736 members (2.04 percent) have an
ethnic background. On average, the European woman makes 16.4 percent less than
her male counterpart, while in America the disparity was 19 percent in 2010. So
yes, there are areas in which we fall behind the Europeans, but as you can see
these numbers are neither mind blowing nor cause to move out of the states and
into the EU.
The point here is not to bash
Europe or to nationalistically bellow about American supremacy, but instead to
point out that our country is not as backward or behind as we northeast
liberals tend to think. Every country experiences social and economic problems
like America has, and we are not unique in our struggles with race relations,
gender inequality, and sexual orientation discrimination (to name a few). I
have loved living in France for the past five months – the food is wonderful,
the history is rich, the streets are old, and the people have been more than
welcoming. But I love my country even more, and these five months have showed
me that the U.S. is my country, for better or for worse. We hear constantly
American politicians rallying the troops with cries of American supremacy and
the promise of a new American century. Sometimes we roll our eyes at what we
consider to be pandering and false patriotism. But honestly, they’re right.
America really is the country of opportunity and innovation, the land of the
free and the home of the brave. In Europe, you get a sense of pessimism first,
and optimism only if things work out. By that I mean the first reaction of
Europeans is to consider that you will probably go wrong in whatever attempt
you are making at that moment – think carefully, because chances are you’ll
screw up, and you probably won’t be able to fix whatever it is you intend to
fix. In America, our philosophy is the opposite – we always think we can, we
always imagine ourselves in a place better than the last, and we are encouraged
to constantly push our limits and became more creative and innovative than ever
before. Think of Barack Obama’s entire 2008 campaign philosophy. For example,
my family has a relative who lives in France and has a 17-year-old son who is
looking forward to his college years. This relative hopes his son will go to
college in the U.S. because that is where he sees the future and where he sees
the opportunity for an individual to thrive and be creative. Yes, my vision of
the American mantra may be a romanticized version of reality, but the sentiment
remains all the same.
The Jardin des plantes in the middle of Toulouse |
You probably think I’m crazy –
“This privileged brat just spent five months living the good life in France and
all he can talk about is how great America is and how much Europe sucks!”
That’s not true at all. I think my sejour
abroad has been deeply meaningful and incredibly important (never a slacker on
the adjectives, am I). My interest and appreciation of European culture has
grown, I became much more proficient in French, I saw more countries and cities
in five months than I did in twenty years, I met many fabulous people and my
palate has expanded more than I could have imagined (Roquefort anyone?) I am
extraordinarily lucky to be able to do this (thanks to Dickinson) but the
experience has also proved that I love America, and am more than happy to call
it my home. Some people come away from their time abroad with the opposite
view, and want nothing more than to shed their American identity for a chicer
European one, and I applaud their decision – there are so many good things
about Europe. But for me, I couldn’t be happier to return to the United States,
to my family, to the way of life I love so much. See you on Sunday!